[2025:RJ-JP:6653] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 50/2025 Rajveer @ Arjun S/o Sanjay, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Hajuri Gate, Harijan Basti, Alwar, P.S. Kotwali Alwar, Distt. Alwar. (Presently The Accused Is In J.c. At Present Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, P.P. Ms. Arti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 14/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.674/2024, registered at Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar, for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2) & 303(2) of B.N.S. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that all the injuries sustained by the injured, have been opined as simple in nature. Charge-sheet has been filed in the matter. The petitioner is in custody since the date of arrest i.e. 14.12.2024. Trial of the case will take considerable time to conclude, till then, keeping the petitioner behind the bars would serve no fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:6653] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-50/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts & circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that the injuries sustained by the injured have been opined as simple in nature; challan has been filed; trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner. 6. The instant bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Rajveer @ Arjun S/o Sanjay, shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. 7. The observation(s) made herein-above is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J SAHIL SONI /406