HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD S.C.C. REVISION No. - 42 of 2018 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Ms. Divya Chaurasia, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Siddharth Singhal, learned counsel for the revisionist and Mr. Amarnath Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite parties/tenants. 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that parties have settled their dispute outside the Court. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite parties/tenants submitted that the possession of the accommodation in question has been handed over to the landlord, as such, the instant revision has become infructuous. 4. In view of aforementioned facts and circumstances of case, the instant revision is dismissed as not pressed. Interim order, if any, is vacated. September 15, 2025 Imtiyaz Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : , Manish Goyal(Senior Adv.), Siddharth Singhal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Amarnath Tiwari (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) S.P. Agrawal(Satya Prakash Agrawal) .....Revisionist(s) Chandra Bhan Jain And Ors .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad