CM-2079-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-5371-2021 (O&M) -1- 101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CM-2079-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-5371-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.04.2025 Preeti ….Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present : Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Devanshu Aggarwal, Senior Panel Counsel, Union of India for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajneesh Chadwal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Arnav Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.5 to 7-BPCL. Mr. Pawan Attri, Advocate for respondent No.8. *** HARSH BUNGER, J. (Oral) CM-2079-CWP-2025 Prayer in the present application is for restoration of the main case (CWP-5371-2021), which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 22.01.2025. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the main case (CWP-5371-2021) is restored to its original number and status and is taken on Board today itself. Application stands disposed of accordingly. HIMANI GUPTA 2025.04.11 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CM-2079-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-5371-2021 (O&M) -2- CWP-5371-2021 (O&M) Petition herein is, inter alia, for quashing letter dated 06.10.2020 (Annexure P-10). 1.1 A further prayer has been made for directing respondents No.5 to 7 to treat application dated 25.12.2018 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioner under Group 1. 1.2 Another prayer has been made for directing respondent No.4 to register the rectified lease deed dated 04.01.2021 (Annexure P-11) and for further commanding respondents No.5 to 7 to consider the rectified lease deed of the petitioner for allotment of the retail outlet. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently the petitioner could not lay challenge to the allotment of the retail outlet in favour of respondent No.8, accordingly he prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition on the same cause of action and also for challenging the allotment made in favour of respondent No.8. 3. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. 4. All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 08.04.2025 (HARSH BUNGER) Himani JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No HIMANI GUPTA 2025.04.11 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh