NARENDER SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/10916/2024 · 2025-07-04
Sandeep Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22500 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22500 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sita Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. a/w connected matters CWP Nos.10907, 10915 & 10916 of 2024 18.09.2025 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath & Mr. Piyush Mehta, Advocates, for the petitioner(s) in all the petitions. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State. CWP No.10916 of 2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, fairly states that in terms of mandate contained in the
judgment, sought to be complied with, respondents, after having considered the representation of the petitioner, have rejected his case, as such, case at hand may be disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, laying therein challenge to order passed in purported compliance of the judgment, sought to be complied with. Ordered accordingly. CWP Nos.10907 & 10915 of 2024 Further four weeks’ time, as prayed for, is granted to learned Additional Advocate General to file compliance affidavit. List on 27.10.2025. September 18, 2025
(Sandeep Sharma),
(sunil) Judge