Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22500 (AP)

CHILAKA RAMALINGESWARA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/16135/2025 · 2025-07-01

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.16135_2025 APHC010317542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16135/2025 Between: 1. CHILAKA RAMALINGESWARA RAO, S/O PUNNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE BUSINESS, R/O 26-182, SUBBAIAH THOTA, BESIDE LAKSHMI CHILDREN HOSPITAL, PURUSHOTHAPATNAM, CHILAKALURIPETA PALNADU DISTRICT PREVIOUSLY GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522616. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT PREVIOUSLY GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET RURAL POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT PREVIOUSLY GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. ARVAPALLI VENKATESWARLU, S/O SESHAGIRI RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O 26-324, SUBBAIAH THOTA, NEAR ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, PURUSHOTHA PATNAM, CHILAKALURIPET, PALNADU DISTRICT PREVIOUSLY GUNTUR 2 HN, J W.P.No.16135_2025 DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522616. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No.3 and 4 in not taking any action on the petitioner's representation dated 26.05.2025 as illegal, arbitrary and amounts to abdication of statutory duties cast up on them and also violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 26.05.2025 by complying with the directions of Apex Court in the case of LALITA KUMARI Vs GOVT. OF U.P. AND ORS(2013)14SCR713 and protect the life and liberty of the Petitioners and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to consider the petitioner representation dated 26.05.2025, pending disposal of writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DAGGUBATI VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 HN, J W.P.No.16135_2025 The Court made the following Order: 1. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the purpose of filing the writ petition has been served. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 02.07.2025 JLV 4 HN, J W.P.No.16135_2025 185 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Writ Petition No.16135 of 2025 Date: 02.07.2025 JLV