- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:400 WP No. 2168 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 2168 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O. KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT FORT, WARD NO.26, SHERUGARA BEEDHI, KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. 2. SMT. B.SARVAMANGALA W/O. K.N.SHIVSHANKARE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT FORT, KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJENDRA KUMAR SUNGAY.T.P., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA - 562 159. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA - 562 159. 3. THE THASILDAR, KANAKAPURA - 562 117. 4. THE COMMISSIONER, CITY MUNICIPALITY, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:400 WP No. 2168 of 2021 KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 117. 5. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PANCHAYATH, ZILLA PANCHAYATH BHAVAN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA - 562 129. 6. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS, PORTS AND INLAND WATER TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, NO.3, KANAKAPURA SUB-DIVISION, KANAKAPURA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 159. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 AND R6; SRI DHANANJAY K. M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI A.V.GANGADHARAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI B.J.SOMAYAJI, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:400 WP No. 2168 of 2021 A perusal of the petition papers reveals that the petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending for almost four years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 80