TIKAM CHAND MAHAR S/O CHOTI LAL MAHAR v. THE DIRECTOR, LOCAL SELF DEPARTMENT
CW/9657/2025 · 2025-07-02
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22499 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22499 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:24217] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9657/2025 Tikam Chand Mahar S/o Choti Lal Mahar, Aged About 60 Years, R/o 16, Vinova Basti, Vinova Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Director, Local Self Department, Civil Lines Phatak, C- Scheme, Jaipur.
2. Jaipur Municipal Corporation, Greater, Jaipur, Lalkothi, Jaipur Through Mayor.
3. The Deputy Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Greater, Jaipur, Jhotwara Zone, Jhotwara, Jaipur.
4. Boduram Choudhary S/o Govind Ram, R/o B-89, Patel Nagar, Shivar, Jaipur.
5. Dinesh Kumar Meena S/o Prabhu Dayal Meena, R/o Bindayaka Talai Wali Dhani, Sinwar Mode, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hanuman Choudhary JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 02/07/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in possession of the patta of the land in question but subsequently the patta of the same land has been issued in favour of respondent Nos.4 and 5 in utter violation of the provisions, hence interference of this Court is warranted.
2. In the considered opinion of this Court, the petitioner has alternative efficacious remedy to assail the validity of the patta issued in favour of the respondent Nos.4 & 5 before appropriate
[2025:RJ-JP:24217] (2 of 2) [CW-9657/2025] authority. He cannot be allowed to bypass the jurisdiction of said authority.
3. On this count alone, the instant writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to assail the validity of the patta before appropriate authority.
4. In case, any appeal/application is submitted by the petitioner before the said authority within a period of one month from today, it is expected from the said authority to hear and decide the same on its merits after affording opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties, expeditiously as early as possible strictly in accordance with law, ignoring the period of limitation.
5. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/50