Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22497 (PNJ)

SUKHRAM v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/9305/2021 · 2025-02-13

Namit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE 248 Sukhram State of Punjab CORAM : HON Present: Mr. for t Mr. *** NAMIT KUMA 1. The Cr.P.C. for qua 02.07.2018 titled 420, 498-A, 406 well as the summ learned JMIC, Ho 2. Lear been compromis present petition. 3. Dism February 13, 20 Pankaj* THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of De Versus and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT Mr. Narinder S. Lucky, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Yuvraj Singh Tiwana, AAG, Pu *** UMAR, J. (ORAL) The petitioners have filed the inst r quashing of the Complaint Case titled as Joginder Kaur Vs. NRI Suri , 406, 376 and 120-B IPC before th e summoning order dated 31.01.2019 IC, Hoshiarpur, qua the petitioner. earned counsel for the petitioner s romised between the parties, therefor ition. Dismissed as not pressed. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable NJAB AND HARYANA AT ARH M No.9305 of 2021 e of Decision:13.02.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondents AMIT KUMAR G, Punjab. e instant petition under Section 482 Case No.COMI 98 of 2018 dated Surinder Jit etc. filed under Sections fore the learned JMIC, Hoshiarpur as 1.2019 and 08.01.2020 passed by the ioner submits that since the matter has erefore, he does not wish to press the (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE ned : Yes/No : Yes/No s n 482 dated ections rpur as by the ter has ess the PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.02.14 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh