Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22495 (RAJ)

AADI MOHAMMED KHAN S/O FAIZ MOHAMMED KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8106/2025 · 2025-07-16

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26545] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8106/2025 Aadi Mohammed Khan S/o Faiz Mohammed Khan, Aged About 20 Years, R/o 9-B Malipura Peer Gate Police Thana Kotwali District Bhopal M.P. At Present House No.- 1840 Khanu Gaon Thana Kohefiza District Bhopal M.P. ( At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 16/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0299/2025 registered at Police Station-Udhyog Nagar (Kota City), District-Kota City for offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. The FIR itself speaks that it was the co-accused who took the complainant's vehicle and sold it to another person. While there is an allegation against the present petitioner regarding the use of a forged Aadhar Card of Nitesh Sharma but there is no FSL report or any other tangible material [2025:RJ-JP:26545] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8106/2025] on record to substantiate that the alleged Aadhar Card is indeed forged. He further submits that the petitioner is behind the Bars since 08.06.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Aadi Mohammed Khan S/o Faiz Mohammed Khan shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/187