1 52.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 52 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10792 OF 2024 IN FAST/19197/2024 THE EX. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. OSMANABAD THR GMIDC, AURANGABAD VERSUS VISHWANATH S/O ANANDA SUTAR AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Warad Sunil V. AGP for Respondent/s – State : Mr. D.B. Bhange … CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : January 23, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. Heard Mr. Warad, learned Advocate appearing for the applicant. 2. The applicant seeks to condone the delay of 449 days cause in filing the appeal. Perused the reasons as stated in the application. It shows that the delay is occasioned on account of administrative reasons. The reasons as stated in the application are not controverted by filing reply. The applicant has not derived any advantage by making the delay. 3. In that view of the matter, sufficient cause is made out. Delay deserves to be condoned. Hence, following order: ORDER i. The Civil Application is allowed. 2 52.odt ii. The delay of 449 days cause in filing the appeal is condoned. iii. Appeal be registered on removal of office objections. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR ) JUDGE spc-