IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos.12986 & 13010 of 2025 Decided on: 12.08.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No. 12986 of 2025 Vinay Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No. 13010 of 2025 Sapna Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Jyoti Dogra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, learned Assistant Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents in both the petitions. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have preferred individual representations annexed with the writ petitions, to the respondents/competent authority for the redressal of their grievances raised in this writ petitions. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be content in case respondents/competent authority is directed to decide the aforesaid representations within a fixed time schedule. Learned Assistant Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, these writ petitions are disposed of with direction respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. 3 The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 12, 2025 Judge R.Atal