Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22488 (CHH)

MOHD. RIZWAN ARIF v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2464/2025 · 2025-05-07

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:21395 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2464 of 2025 Mohd. Rizwan Arif S/o Mohd. Mustaque Ahmad Aged About 29 Years R/o Madni Chowk, Near Asif Kirana Stores, Sanjay Nagar, Tikrapara, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Its Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Municipal Corporation, Raipur Through - Its Commissioner, White House, Near Gandhi Chowk, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Zone Commissioner Zone-10, Municipal Corporation, Raipur, At - Amlidih, Behind Water Tank, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Shrijita Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. R.K. Gupta, Additional Advocate General For Respondents No.2 & 3 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 08.05.2025 1. Heard Ms. Shrijita Kesharwani, Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. R.K. Gupta, Additional Advocate General for the State/respondent YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.05.13 12:11:25 +0530 2 No.1 and Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition has been filed for demolishing of his shop, which is situated in the Government land. 3. Prima facie, it seems that the instant petition is not maintainable as the notices are yet to be issued for removal of encroachment by the respondent authorities including the Municipal Corporation or the State authorities. 4. Accordingly, while disposing of the instant petition, it is directed that the notices be issued to the petitioner and after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, necessary action will be taken. 5. With the aforesaid observation/direction, instant petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh