Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 224874 (MAD)

A.PALANISAMY @ SATHISH v. State rep

CRL OP/34065/2025 · 2025-12-12

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.34065 of 2025 A.Palanisamy @ Sathish Petitioner Vs The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Karumathampatty Police Station, Coimbatore District. Crime No.487 of 2025. Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner in Crime No.487 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.11.2025 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 4(1)(c) of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1973 and section 77 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 in Crime No.487 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 12 numbers of TASMAC liquor bottles without any valid permission. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 12 numbers of TASMAC liquor bottles without any proper license. He would also submit that there are 23 previous cases, similar in nature, pending against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5. Considering the nature of offence committed by the petitioner, and taking note of the fact that there are 23 previous cases, similar in nature, pending against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 12.12.2025 mpa To 1.The Inspector of Police, Karumathampatty Police Station, Coimbatore District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis K.RAJASEKAR, J., mpa CRL OP NO.34065 of 2025 12.12.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis