Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22484 (RAJ)

MS. ANSHUL SHARMA DAUGHTER OF DR. RAM KISHAN SHARMA v. BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

CW/9629/2025 · 2025-07-14

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26111] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9629/2025 Ms. Anshul Sharma Daughter Of Dr. Ram Kishan Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of 38, Kalyan Colony, Lane No. 18, Tonk Phatak, District Jaipur -302015, Rajasthan, India. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Bureau Of Indian Standards, Through Its Director General, 9, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002. 2. Bureau Of Indian Standards, Through Its Branch Head, Jaipur Branch Office - Prithavi Raj Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur-302001, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gupta Dr. Ram Kishan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, ASG through VC Mr. Tarun Agarwal Mr. Bhaskar Agarwal Ms. Parthvi Ahuja Ms. Mitali Karwa HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 14/07/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by petitioner, impugning the Office Order dated 09.06.2025 passed by the Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, whereby and whereunder services of petitioner as Assistant Director (Admin. & Finance) have been transferred from Headquarter- Legal Department, New Delhi to CRO, New Delhi. 2. Learned Additional Solicitor General, appearing for respondents, raised a preliminary objection in respect of territorial [2025:RJ-JP:26111] (2 of 2) [CW-9629/2025] jurisdiction of the Rajasthan High Court to entertain this writ petition and attention of this Court has been drawn to a previous order dated 27.05.2025 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in earlier writ petition filed by petitioner, being SBCWP No.17730/2024 against her order of termination, whereunder petitioner withdrew her writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition before the Delhi High Court. 3. Having faced with such preliminary objection, counsel for petitioner, having instructions of petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the judicial forum at New Delhi. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not press with the liberty as prayed for. 5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/14