SUBHASH GOUR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND REPRESENTED THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
C.M.P./314/2025 · 2025-04-11
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22484 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22484 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:11148 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P No.314 of 2025
----- 1.Subhash Gour 2.Baidyanath Gour @ Bhusu 3.Jiten Gour 4.Haren Gour All sons of late Manu Gour, resident of Gour Basti, PO and PS Mango, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum (Jharkhand)
… Petitioner(s).
Versus The State of Jharkhand represented through Deputy Commissioner, PO and PS Sakchi, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum
… Opposite Party(s).
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Vani Kumari, Advocate For the Opp. Party(s) : Ms. Laxmi Murmu, GP-I
Mr. Saurav Mahto, AC to GP-I …...... 05 /11.04.2025: Issue notice to the opposite party-State.
2. Mr. Saurav Mahto, learned AC to GP-I appears and accepts notice on behalf of opposite party-State.
I.A. No. 9834 of 2024
3. This interlocutory application has been filed by the petitioners praying therein to condone delay of 55 days in preferring this civil miscellaneous petition.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties on the point of limitation and considering the statements made in paragraph nos. 3 & 4 of the interlocutory application, I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for condoning the delay caused in preferring this petition. I am inclined to allow this interlocutory application. Delay of 55 days in preferring this civil miscellaneous petition is condoned.
5. This interlocutory application stands allowed.
C.M.P. No. 314 of 2025
6. After hearing the parties, I find that this is an application for restoration of CMP No. 709 of 2022 to its original file, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order.
2025:JHHC:11148 2
7. Ms. Vani Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioners begs apology for inconvenience caused to the Hon’ble Court and submits that no sooner the CMP is restored, she will remove the defect(s) within two weeks.
8. Considering his submissions, this CMP is allowed. Consequently, CMP No. 709 of 2022 is restored to its original file subject to condition that the defect(s) pointed out by the Registry must be removed within a period of two weeks, failing which, this order of restoration will not be given effect to.
9. After restoration, CMP No. 709 of 2022 be listed before an appropriate Bench.
10. I.A. No. 9835 of 2024 stands disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/