APHC010317812020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21021/2020 Between: 1. CHAND BEEBI, , W/O LATE ABDUL RAZAK, INDIAN MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO- 13-233/1, INDIRA NAGAR, GOPALPATNAM, VISAKHPATNAM 2. SHAIK KHASIM, S/O LATE ABDUL RAZAK, INDIAN MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, MECHANIC, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO-10- 57/4,GANESH NAGAR, GOPALPATNAM 3. MAHAMMAD THAJUDDIN, S/O LATE ABDUL RAZAK, INDIAN MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, PVT. EMPLOYEE, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO- 13-233/1/A, INDIRA NAGAR, GOPALPATNAM, VISAKHPATNAM 4. ABDUL KHALEEL SHAIK, S/O LATE ABDUL RAZAK, INDIAN MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,RESIDENT OF DOOR NO-38-31-65/1, NEAR I.P.0 CHURCH, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. SHAINAAZ, W/O MOHAMMAD RAZACK, INDIAN MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO- 45-2-76, MUSLIM THATICHETLAPALEM, AKKAYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, 2ND BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, ROOM NO-185, A.P. SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRIC 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BUCHINGAMPET, VIJAYAWADA 3 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE(URBAN) VISAKHAPATNAM 3. S H 0 GOPALPATNAM P S, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY , VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 4TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, A.P. SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI 5. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 4TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, A.P. SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI 6. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, 2 VISAKHAPATNAM 7. TAHSILDAR, GOPALPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY 8. SALMA DOULATH JOHNY, W/O LATE MOHAMMAD SALEEM, INDIAN MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES,DOOR NO- 45-2-27/3, NEAR PALLAVI APARTMENT, MUSLIM THATICHETLAPALEM, AKKAYAPALEM,VISAKHAPATNAM. 9. MD MOHIDDIN, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, INDIAN MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RETD. RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO- 45-2-46, MUSLIM THATICHETLAPALEM, AKKAYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM 10. MD NIJAMUDDIN, S/O MD.MOHIDDIN, INDIAN MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS PVT.EMPLOYEE,RESIDENT OF DOOR NO- 45-2- 46, MUSLIM THATICHETLAPALEM, AKKAYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 11. MD KHAZAMOHIDDIN, S/O MD.MOHIDDIN, INDIAN MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,STEEL PLANT EMPLOYEE, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO- 45-2-46, MUSLIM THATICHETLAPALEM, AKKAYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 12. MD NOORUDDIN, S/O MD.MOHIDDIN, INDIAN MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 28 YFARS, PVT.ERNPLOYEE, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO- 45-2-46, MUSLIM THATICHETLAPALEM, AKKAYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 13. AMRNAJAAN, W/O SK.ALI , INDIAN MUSLIM ,AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO- 45/2/32, MUSLIM THATICHETLAPALEM, AKKAYAPALEM , VISAKHAPATNAM 14. MD PARVEEN, W/O MD.MUSTAFA, INDIAN MUSLIM ,AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, RESIDENT. OF DOOR NO- 38- 30/84, SAI NAGAR, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM 15. NASREEN C CHOTI, W/O TAJUDDIN, INDIAN MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO- 25-29-2, MOULALI PANJA-NEAR STATE BANK OF INDIA,OLD POST OFFICE, I TOWN, VISAKHAPATNAM-01 16. SHAINAAZ MUNNI, W/O USMAN, INDIAN MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO- 38-38- 28/2, SHIVANAGAR, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NH AKBAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents especially Respondent No 8 herein in threatening the petitioners with dire consequences and harassing the petitioners by calling them to the Police Station without any fault of the petitioners the eighth respondent highhandedly threatening the petitioners that they would implicate in false cases as illegal arbitrary unjust against to the Violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents not to call the petitioners or their family members to the police station with unconnected issue or interfere with the peaceful enjoyment of our family and personal life except under due process of law” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not calling the petitioners to the police station. 4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.09.2025 Asr 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.21021 of 2020 Dt.02.09.2025 Asr