Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 224830 (MAD)

Sabiya v. State, Inspector of Police,

CRL MP/23808/2025 · 2025-12-12

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.M.P.No.23808 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.28074 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Crl.M.P.No.23808 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.28074 of 2025 1.Sabiya 2.Nabisa 3.Rahim @ Rahim Basha 4.Anwardeen Ismail ... Petitioners Vs. State: Inspector of Police, T4 Madhuravoyal Police Station, Chennai District. ... Respondent (Crime No.641 of 2025) PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Act, 2023, to extend the time for furnishing sureties by one week orders passed in Crl.O.P.No.28074 of 2025, dated 15.10.2025 in Cr.No.641 of 2025. For Petitioners : Mr.M.J.Srinivas For Respondent : Mrs.J.R.Archana, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking further extension of the time by one week to furnish sureties as ordered by this Court vide order dated 15.10.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.28074 of 2025. 2. When the matter taken up for hearing today, it is reported by the 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.23808 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.28074 of 2025 learned counsel for the petitioners that already the petitioners 1 to 3 have regularly complied with the condition imposed by this Court vide order dated 15.10.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.28074 of 2025 that “the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation”. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant further time to the fourth petitioner alone to comply with the condition. 3. Considering the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is partly allowed. As far as the petitioners 1 to 3 are concerned, no further orders are required. In so far as the fourth petitioner namely Anwardeen Ismail is concerned, time is extended by one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, to comply with the conditions as imposed by this Court vide dated 15.10.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.28074 of 2025. 12.12.2025 ssi To 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.23808 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.28074 of 2025 1.The Inspector of Police, T4 Madhuravoyal Police Station, Chennai District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. K.RAJASEKAR , J. ssi 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.23808 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.28074 of 2025 Crl.M.P.No.23808 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.28074 of 2025 12.12.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis