IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos.13168 & 13172 of 2025 Decided on: 18.08.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No. 13168 of 2025 Ishan Sharma …..Petitioner Versus CSKHPKV & Anr .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No. 13172 of 2025 Himanshu Mehta …..Petitioner Versus CSKHPKV & Anr .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Anita Devi, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Prince Chauhan, learned counsel and Mr. L. N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respective respondents in both the petitions. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed individual representations, annexed with the respective writ petitions, to respondent No.1 for the redressal of the issues raised in these writ petitions, however, the representations preferred by them in light of settled legal position, have not been adjudicated till date. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be content in case respondent No.1/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents are not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The 3 decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 18, 2025 Judge R.Atal