2025:JHHC:15260 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5848 of 2024 ------ Mausham Mishra @ Mausam Mishra, son of Late Bijayananda Mishra. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Nibedita Mishra, W/o Mausham Mishra, D/o Shankar Prasad Choubey. … … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishi Pallava, Advocate Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, A.P.P. Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Faiyaj Alam, Advocate ----- 09/ 12.06.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.08 of 2024, for offences under Sections 498-A, 307, 313, 323, 504, 506 and 34 IPC. The case is presently pending before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State and learned counsel representing the informant oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. The petitioner is the husband of the informant. There is an allegation against this petitioner that he used to torture and assault his wife. Because of the said torture and assault, a criminal case was instituted being C.P. Case No.3211 of 2022. In the said C.P. Case, the petitioner and other family members of this petitioner compromised in the Mediation Centre at Dhanbad, and 2025:JHHC:15260 2 thereafter had taken the informant at her matrimonial home. Again after sometime torture started and there is specific allegation against this petitioner of assaulting his wife, for which the instant F.I.R. was lodged. 5. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to this petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3