Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22476 (AP)

PERURI ANUSUNDAR v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/15772/2025 · 2025-06-26

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010316122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 3.' FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15772 OF 2025 Between: 1. Peruri Anusundar, S/o. Hari Krishna Hare Rama Krishna Aged about 24 years, Occ. Barber, R/o. D.No.4-50, Marripudi Village, Rangampeta Mandal, Kakinada District (Erstwhile East Godavari District). 2. Edida Ananda Rao, S/o Moshe, Aged about 59 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o D.No. 1-19/11, Indira Colony Mandal, Kakinada District, (Erstwhile East Godavari District) Marripudi Village,Rangampeta ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada District, Godavari District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Peddapuram, Kakinada District, Erstwhile East Godavari District. 4. The Station House Officer, Rangampeta Police Station, Rangampeta, Kakinada District, Erstwhile East Godavari District. 5. Inakoti Rajeswari, W/o Satyanarayana, Aged about 55 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o Indira Colony, Marripudi Village, Rangampeta Mandal, Kakinada District, (Erstwhile East Godavari District). erstwhile East 6. Bandari Maridamma, w/o Venkateswaralu, Housewife, Aged about 53 years, Occ. R/o Doddigunta Road, Rangampeta Mandal Kakinada District, (Erstwhile East Godavari District). 7. Kommana Varalakshmi, w/o Murthy, Housewife, Aged about 55 years, Occ. Darga Centre, Kakinada District, (Erstwhile East R/o Nayibrahamana Colony, PeddapuramTown and Mandal, Godavari District). 8. Pasupuleti Manga, w/o Satyanarayana, Aged about 49 Housewife, years, Occ. Marripudi Village, (Erstwhile East Godavari R/o D.No.2-27, Chakalipeta Rangampeta Mandal, Kakinada District, District). ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent No. 4 in calling upon the Petitioners to the Police Station on 24.06.2025 and made them one in the to sit in the Police Station without there being any crime and directing the Petitioners to handover the land an extent of Ac. 1.78 cents situated at Sy. 1.78 cents situated at Sy. No.301/1 Rangampeta Mandal, Kakinada District, of Marripudi Village, Erstwhile East Godavari District on the influence/instigation of Respondent No.5 to 8 herein as nothing but misusing the Executive Powers conferred upon him illegal, erroneous, arbitrary, highhanded and violative of Article 21 and 300 A of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 4 to not to call upon the Petitioners to the Police Station and direct them the possession agricultural of Marripudi Village, District. land an extent of Ac. 1.78 cents, situated at Sy. No.301/1 Rangampeta Mandal, Kakinada District, Erstwhile East Godavari lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 4 not to call upon the Petitioners to the Police Station and direct them the possession agricultural land an extent of Ac. 1.78 cents, situated at Sy.No.301/1 of Marripudi Village, Rangampeta Mandal, Kakinada District, Erstwhile East Godavari District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI A. K. KISHORE REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 8:— The Court made the following order: APHC010316122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15772/2025 Between: Peruri Anusundar and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.A K KISHORE REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ^ . ^ ORDER:- The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent No.4 is interfering in a civil dispute between the petitioners and respondent Nos.5 to 8. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that respondent 2. No.4 is not interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioners and respondent Nos.5 to 8. Considering the same, this Court is inclined to dispose off the Writ 3. Petition at the admission stage by directing respondent No.4 not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioners and respondent Nos.5 to 8 without following the due process of law. With these observations, this Writ Petition is disposed off. No costs. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sdl- N NAGAiViMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER SEO To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada District, erstwhile East Godavari District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Peddapuram, Kakinada District, Erstwhile East Godavari District. 4. The Station House Officer, Rangampeta Police Station, Rangampeta, Kakinada District, Erstwhile East Godavari District. 5. One CC to Sri A. K. Kishore Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Three CD Copies r HIGH COURT DATED:27/06/2025 ORDER WP NO. 15772 OF 2025 ^ 0 7 JUL 2025 J)| ttentSectiQiJX'^5^ ov PAT DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS