APHC010316702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI ir f U TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE •• •• . '• X: PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6977 OF 2025 Between; S Mohammed Jameel, S/o. S. Rahamathulla, Aged about 40 Occ. Electrician, Madanapalle, Annamayya District, A.P. years, Muslim, R/o.D.No. 11-60, Ranga Reddy colony, Kothapalli ...PETITIONER/A1 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, SHO Madanapalle Taluq Police Station Madanapalle, Annamayya District Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Court at Amaravati, A.P. High 2. Shaik Shabeen Taj, W/o. Shaik Mohammed AN, aged about 37 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H.No. 13-264, Gousiya Street, Ranga Reddy colony, Kothapalli, Madanapalle Mandal, Annamayya District, Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in FIR No. 64 of 2025 Dt. 09-03-2025, on the file of Madanapalle Taluka Police Station, Madanapalle, Annamayya District, A.P. lA NO: 2 OF 2Q2fi Petition under Section 528 of BNSS 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner in FIR No. 64 of 2025 Dt. 09-03-2025, on the file of Madanapalle Taluka Police Station, Madanapalle, Annamayya District, A.P. Counsel for the Petitioner : MRS. PATNOOL FARIDA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 ; PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : -- The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010316702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT A.'VIARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6977/2025 Between: 1.S MOHAMMED JAMEEL,, S/O S RAHAMATHULLA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, MUSLIM, R/O.D.NO.11-60, RANGA REDDY COLONY, KOTHAPALLI, MADANAPALLE,ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, A OCC- ELECTRICIAN, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SHO MADANAPALLE TALUQ. POLICE STATION, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI, AP 2.SHAIK SHABEEN TAJ, W/0. SHAIK MOHAMMED AN, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE, R/0. H.NO. 13-264, GOUSIYA STREET, RANGA REDDY COLONY, KOTHAPALLI, MADANAPALLE MAN DAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to call for the records in FIR No. 64 of 2025 Dt. 09-03-2025, on the file oISap ™ ““ process of law and jAJSIO: 1 OF 9071^ , Madanapalle, Annamayya same as the same is Illegal, abuse of quash the pass that in Mb Criminal Petition,the High Court mal he 7°''^"''"'" of Grounds o. dispense with the filinq of the eT a f* niay be pleased to 2025 Dt. 09-03-202^1 the TofmT Station, Madanapalle, Annamayya District APr"d-‘ - the mam criminal petition and may pass ’ ^ ^ of Police of jANO: 2 OF 20?/; Petition under Section 48? nf rr d n that in the circumstances stated in thp m Praying Criminal Petition,the High Court me h °< Grounds grant stay of all further proceeal? ?!"^"'' ‘ fo in FIR No. 64 of 2025 Df ' 09-03 2025'^ol" Taluka Police Station, Madanapalle ' A ® Madanapalle "r;. “rr, .rr Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: of AP 1.PATNOOL FARIDA Counsel for the Respondent/c 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR omplainant(S): 3 The Court made the following order: The petitioner is arrayed as accused No.1 in Crime No.64 of the file of Madanapalle Taluka Madanapalle, Annamayya District, for alleged Sections 74. 318(4). 126(2). 351(2), 79 of BNS. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 3. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner filed this petition seeking the quashing of the FIR, he has, however, restricted the relief to the extent of directing the Investigating Officer to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 35(3) of the BNSS guidelines prescribed by the Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar\ 4. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor stated that objection to give such a direction. The Criminal Petition is disposed of by directing the Station House Officer, Madanapalle Taluka Police Station. District, to follow the procedure 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita “BNSS”) in so far as the petitioners are concerned. 2025, on Police Station offence under and the he has no 5. Annamayya as contemplated under Section 2023 (for short (2014) 8 see 273 4 As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K.KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI To, 1. The Station House Officer, Madanapalle Taluq Police Station, Madanapalle, Annamayya District. 2. One CC to Mrs. PATNOOL FARIDA Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies Chp TAC HIGH COURT DATED:08/07/2025 S 2 n AUG 2025 m Co Current Section . ^ ORDER CRLP NO. 6977 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION