Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2247 (KAR)

SRI JAVAREGOWDA v. KUM THANUSHREE

RSA/1101/2021 · 2026-06-18

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32529 RSA No. 1101 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1101 OF 2021(PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. SRI JAVAREGOWDA S/O LATE NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 2. SMT KEMPAMMA W/O JAVAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 3. SRI H J SHIVANNEGOWDA S/O JAVAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 4. SRI H J LINGEGOWDA S/O JAVAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 5. SMT H J BHAGYA D/O JAVAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS ALL THE APPELLANTS ARE R/AT HIRGE VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, HD KOTE TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT-571 114 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI NARENDRA P R, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32529 RSA No. 1101 of 2021 AND: 1. KUM THANUSHREE D/O LATE SOMASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS BEING A MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER/AND GUARDIAN SMT PAVITHRA 2. SMT PAVITHRA W/O LATE SOMASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS BOTH THE RESPONDENTS RESIDING AT HIRGE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI HD KOTE TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT-571 114 …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.12.2020 PASSED IN R.A.No.243/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU, SITTING AT HUNSUR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.08.2017 PASSED IN OS No.31/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNSUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Case called twice. None represents on behalf of the appellants. The matter is listed from yesterday to today on behalf of the request of the appellants. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32529 RSA No. 1101 of 2021 2. Appeal is of the year 2021. Appellants have not chosen to address the arguments. Order sheet depicts that appellants are not diligent in prosecuting the appeal. 3. Taking note of the same, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR