IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO R.F.A. NO.711 OF 2012 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PALLAMMA W/O LATE POORNA MUTHAPPA AGED MAJOR 2. SMT. DODDA BORAMMA D/OLATE POORNA MUTHAPPA AGED MAJOR 3. SMT. NELAGATHA OBAMMA SINCE DECEASED REP. BY HER LEGAL HEIRS 3(a) SRI. DODDAPALAIAH S/O ANGADI PALAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 3(b) SRI. DODDAPALAIAH S/O DODDAPALAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 3(b) SRI THIPPESH KUMAR S/O DODDAPALAIAH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 4. SMT. DODDABORAMMA D/O LATE POORNA MUTHPPA AGED MAJOR 2 5. SMT. CHENNAMMA D/O LATE POORNA MUTHAPPA AGED MAJOR 6. SRI. POORNA OBAIAH S/O LATE POORNA MUTHAPPA AGED MAJOR ALL ARE RESIDING AT NELGATENAHALLI, CHELLAKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT – 577 522 …APPELLANTS (BY PARTY IN PERSON, ABSENT) AND: SRI. JAMSHED NARIMAN BILLIMORIA, S/O LATE NARIMAN K.BILLIMORIA, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.394, JUDGE’S COLONY, R T NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 032. ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI K.BHEEMAIAH, ADVOCATE) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 13TH OCTOBER 2011 PASSED BY THE XXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE AT BANGALORE CITY, CCH-23 IN O.S.NO.5874/2002 BY DISMISSING THE SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFF. 3 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The appellants – in – person are absent. 2. No representation. 3. Paper books are not filed. 4. The appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE VK