Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22465 (ALL)

KISHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/2453/2025 · 2025-03-04

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:31395 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2453 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kishan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Malay Kumar Sharma,Praveen Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Harshit Pandey Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Praveen Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondent No. 1 and Shri Harshit Pandey, learned counsel counsel for the respondents No. 2 and 3. The petitioner claims that he is entitled to ACP benefits. He has made a representation in this regard but to no avail. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that the matter requires determination of facts by the competent authority as per law in the first instance. However, they fairly contend that his claim for ACP benefit is liable to be decided by the competent authority in a reasonable time frame. In light of the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the respondent No.2-Health Officer, Nagar Nigam Kanpur Nagar is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner regarding ACP benefits as per law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with a fresh copy of the representation. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Jaswant Digitally signed by :- JASWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad