Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22461 (HP)

DESH RAJ v. THE CSKHPKVV

CWP/14147/2025 · 2025-09-16

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:HHC:31764 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14147 of 2025 Date of Decision: 16.09.2025 _______________________________________________________ Sh. Desh Raj …….Petitioner Versus CSKHPKVV ….Respondent _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal and Mr. Shashwat Dadwal, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment dated 03.09.2025 passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.10312 of 2024, titled Sarup Chand vs. Chaudhary Shrawan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya. 2. Having perused the averments contained in the petition, especially relief clause vis-à-vis judgment dated 03.09.2025 passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Sarup Chand’s case (supra), this Court finds that case of the petitioner is identical to the aforesaid case decided by Coordinate Bench of this Court. Vide aforesaid judgment, this Court has already dealt with all the points raised in the instant petition and as such, no prejudice, if any, shall be caused to either of 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:31764 2 the parties in case directions contained in Sarup Chand’s case (supra) are ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the case at hand. 3. Consequently, In view of the above, the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Sarup Chand’s case (supra) are ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the present case for all intents and purposes. In the aforesaid terms, present petition is disposed of alongwith pending application(s), if any. p` (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 16, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi)