Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1/2 (WPS No. 5950 of 2017)
2025:CGHC:6866
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (SERVICE) NO. 5950 OF 2017
1. Pratibha Dubey, D/o Late Shri N.P. Dubey, aged about 56 years, R/o Mahima Nagar, Sirgitti, Police Station Sirgitti, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Vikas Bhawan, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Rajesh Dewangan, Office of Municipal Corporation, Vikas Bhawan, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Manjur Hussain, Office of Municipal Corporation, Vikas Bhawan, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
5. Smt. Anuradha Shrivas, Office of Municipal Corporation, Vikas Bhawan, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
6. Abdul Hafiz Khan, Office of Municipal Corporation, Vikas Bhawan, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
7. Smt. Karuna Vaidh, Office of Municipal Corporation, Vikas Bhawan, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
8. Santosh Soni, Office of Municipal Corporation, Vikas Bhawan, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
9. Rajesh Verma, Office of Municipal Corporation, Vikas Bhawan, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
10. Ramesh Singh Chauhan, Office of Municipal Corporation, Vikas Bhawan, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
2/2 (WPS No. 5950 of 2017)
11. Shyam Rao Madne, Office of Municipal Corporation, Vikas Bhawan, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :- Mr. K.P.S. Gandhi, Advocate. For Respondent-State :- Dr. Surendra Kumar Dewangan, Panel Lawyer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Single
Bench
] Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order
on Board
(06-02-2025)
1.
Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the present Writ Petition has become infructuous as no cause of action survives for consideration any further.
2. The Writ Petition accordingly stands dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) sharad Judge SHARAD KUMAR YADAV Digitally signed by SHARAD KUMAR YADAV Date: 2025.02.07 17:45:02 +0530