Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22455 (ALL)

SMT. ANJU SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/344/2025 · 2025-05-18

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:83756 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 344 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Anju Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Misc. Case No. 67/11A/ 2021 of 2022, under Section 125(3) CrPC, pending in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Basti expeditiously within the stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the wife of opposite party no.2 and present case is pending since 2021. It is further submitted that the case under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was allowed in her favour but since then the said order could not be complied with for want of money deposited in the bank account of opposite party no.2, the husband, and that compelled the present applicant to file a matter under Section 125 (3) Cr.P.C. Applicant is not in a position to attend the Court for the pairvi of the case on each and every date. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 5. The opposite party no.2 is not cooperating with the progress of the case. This Court is also aware of the fact that the Family Courts in the State of U.P. are overburdened with the cases and are, as such gasping for breath. 6. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to decide the aforesaid case within two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 19.5.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad