MAROTI S/O RANGNATH GAVHAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS
CA/7395/2022 · 2025-03-24
Shri Neeraj P Dhote
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22451 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22451 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
39-CA-7395-2022.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 39 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7395 OF 2022 IN FAST/20179/2020 Maroti S/o Rangnath Gavhad ….Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra Through Collector, Jalna And Others …..Respondents ….. Mr. S. R. Shirsat h/f Mr. D. M. Pingale, Advocate for Applicant Mr. Rajdeep D. Raut, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. S. G. Bhalerao, Advocate for Respondent No.3 …..
CORAM :
NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 24.03.2025 PER COURT :
1. This is an Application fled by the Claimant for condonation of 2827 days delay caused in fling the First Appeal against the
Judgment and Award passed by the Reference Court in the Land Acquisition Proceedings.
2. It is submitted by the learned Advocate Mr. Bhalerao for Respondent No.3 submits that, the learned A.G.P can appear for all the Respondents. Hence, his appearance may be discharged.
3. In view of the above submission, the appearance of learned Advocate Mr. Bhalerao for Respondent No.3 is discharged.
4. Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court, the learned A.G.P appears for all the Respondents.
5. It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the Applicant that, suffcient reasons are mentioned in the Application, which 1 2025:BHC-AUG:9052
39-CA-7395-2022.odt prevented the Applicant to fle the Appeal within the stipulated time and, therefore, the Application be allowed.
6. The Application is opposed by the learned A.G.P for the Respondents - State. He submits that, no suffcient reasons are mentioned in the Application and therefore, the Application be rejected.
7. On going through the Application and for the reasons mentioned in Paragraph Nos.5 and 6 of the Application, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause - ‘A’, subject to the condition that, the Applicant / Appellant shall not be entitled for the statutory benefts and the interest for the aforesaid delayed period. Appeal be registered. The copy of this order be kept in the
order sheet of the Appeal memo.
8. Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly.
[NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.]
Sameer/March-2025 2 Signed by: Md. Sameer Q. Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 27/03/2025 16:18:51