Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22446 (KAR)

SRI. SHIRIHARI v. SRI. M. L. NARAYANASWAMY

WP/12380/2024 · 2025-06-18

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21119 WP No. 12380 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 12380 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SHIRIHARI, S/O LATE VENKATESH C., AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.32/4, 1ST 'D' MAIN ROAD, GOWDANAPALYA, SUBRAMANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU - 560 061. 2. SMT. CHETHANA V., D/O LATE VENKATESH C., AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.32/4, 1ST 'D' MAIN ROAD, GOWDANAPALYA, SUBRAMANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU - 560 061. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. M. L. NARAYANASWAMY, S/O LATE MUNIBYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1031, IN FRONT OF T.B. SUBHASHA NAGARA, NELAMANGALA TOWN, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21119 WP No. 12380 of 2024 2. SMT. PUSHPA @ PUSHAVATHI, W/O LATE VENKATESH C., AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.35, PROPERTY NO.22 ANURADHA NILAYA, 1ST 'D' MAIN ROAD GOWDANAPALYA, SUBRAMANYAPURA POST BENGALURU - 560 061. 3. SRI. G.M. ARUNUKUMAR, S/O LATE MOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 4TH CROSS, SRIRANGANAGARA BSK III STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21.12.2023 (ANNX-A) PASSED IN EX NO. 2033/2015 BY THE LEARNED XXXI ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE (CCH-14) AT BENGALURU AND CONSEQUENTIAL ORDERS AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21119 WP No. 12380 of 2024 "MEMO It is humbly submitted that, I may be permitted to withdraw the above case, as in view of the decree holders obtained the vacant possession of the schedule property in the proceeding in Ex.No.2033/2015, therefore, above writ petition became infructuous. Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that I may kindly be permitted to withdraw the above case as infructuous, in the interest of justice and equity." 2. In terms of memo, the petition stands disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8 CT: BHK