Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22445 (CHH)

RAVISHANKAR v. SONALAL

MAC/1004/2019 · 2025-08-13

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:41672 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1003 of 2019 1 - Ravishankar S/o Jaikaran Singh Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Akalsarai, P.S. Sonhat, District Koriya Chhattisgarh. ---(Driver) 2 - Smt. Mankunwar W/o Amarjeet, R/o Village Akalsarai, P.S. Sonhat, District Koriya Chhattisgarh. ---(Owner) --- Appellant (s) versus 1 - Devraj S/o Budhhu Aged About 55 Years 2 - Smt. Phulmati W/o Devraj Aged About 50 Years 3 - Sunil Kumar S/o Late Ibdrapal Aged About 11 Years 4 - Subhash Kumar S/o Late Ibdrapal Aged About 11 Years No. 3 & 4 are Minor, Represented Through Their Guardian Devraj No. 1 to 4 R/o Village Kishori, P.S. Sonhat, District Koriya Chhattisgarh. 5 - Manager, Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. 15th Floor, Tower A, Peninsula Business Park, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Off Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai. ---(Insurer) --- Respondent(s) MAC No. 1004 of 2019 1 - Ravishankar S/o Jaikaran Singh Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Akalsarai, P.S. Sonhat, District Koriya Chhattisgarh. ---(Driver) 2 - Smt. Mankunwar W/o Amarjeet, R/o Village Akalsarai, P.S. Sonhat, Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2025.08.19 11:13:27 +0530 -2- District Koriya Chhattisgarh. ---(Owner) ---Appellant (s) Versus 1 - Sonalal S/o Purushottam Aged About 50 Years 2 - Kalawati W/o Sonalal Aged About 48 Years 3 - Premwati W/o Late Suresh Kumar Aged About 28 Years 4 - Kumari Aradhana D/o Late Suresh Kumar Aged About 6 Years 5 - Kumari Sadhna D/o Late Suresh Kumar Aged About 5 Years 6 - Kumari Priyanshu D/o Late Suresh Aged About 4 Years No. 4 to 6 are Minor, Represented Through Their Guardian Mother Smt. Premwati W/o Late Suresh Kumar All R/o Village Kishori, P.S. Sonhat, District Koriya Chhattisgarh 7 - Manager, Tata AIR General Insurance Co. Ltd. 15th Floor, Tower A, Peninsula Business Park, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Off Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai. ---(Insurer) --- Respondent(s) ________________________________________________________ For Appellant (s) : None appears For Resp./Insurance Company : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate _______________________________________________________ S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Judgment On Board 14 /08/2025 1. These appeals are listed for final hearing in weekly list and called for hearing continuously since Monday i.e. 11.08.2025, however, no one appeared on behalf of appellants even after making consecutive calls. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of appellants. 2. In the aforementioned facts of case, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeals for want of prosecution. -3- 3. Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/-- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen