Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110133 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5430 of 2025 Petitioner :- Omveer Respondent :- State Of U.P.And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. Pursuant to order dated 07.07.2025, Tehsildar-Dadri, District- Gautam Budh Nagar is present in the Court who is identified by Sri J.N. Maurya, learned Chief Standing Counsel.
2. Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General is also present. He submits that after the sale-deed was executed, information was sent by Sub-Registrar to office of Tehsildar on RCCMS Portal.
3. The officer concerned has filed his personal affidavit, which has been taken on record, wherein attention has been drawn to the
order passed by officer concerned on 30.12.2024 rejecting the application filed by petitioner under Section 34 on the ground of non appearance of petitioner. A restoration application was filed on 01.04.2025 which was accepted and mutation order has already been passed on 05.04.2025, a copy of the order has already been provided to Power of Attorney of petitioner after the application was allowed.
4. According to learned Additional Advocate General, the order has been carried out and necessary mutation has been made on record. Copy of the khatauni has been annexed as annexure no. 4 to the personal affidavit.
5. Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General has further informed the Court that pursuant to oral direction of this Court dated 02.07.2025, State Government has issued a circular in regard to early disposal of the applications filed under Section 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The necessary direction has been issued on 09.07.2025 and has been addressed to all Collectors of the State. The said circular has been placed before the Court, which is taken on record.
6. From perusal of the orders and records brought before this Court, I find that present petition has been filed on narration of wrong facts by petitioner, concealing that earlier mutation application was rejected and, thereafter, restoration application was moved by him which was allowed and, thereafter, mutation order was passed.
7. Writ petition is dismissed with a cost of Rs.50,000/- to be recovered as arrears of land revenue.
8. Personal appearance of officer concerned is exempted.
Order Date :- 10.7.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad