- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15765 CRL.P No. 4891 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4891 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. MOHAMED AFNAS @ AFNAS S/O ABDUL AJITH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT KANI ROAD AREA UDALI POST KANNUR DISTRICT KERALA STATE. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAKSHITH R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HALASURU GATE PS REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560 001. 2. BHIM CHAUDHARY S/O LATE LAKHAN CHAUDHARY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS AGM RESERVE BANK OF INDIA NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU CITY - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL RAI, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO DECLARE THE ARREST OF THE PETITIONER DATED 16.09.2024 CRIME NO.225/2024 REGISTERED IN HALASURU GATE PS FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 178, 179, 180, Digitally signed by R HEMALATHA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15765 CRL.P No. 4891 of 2025 181, 182 OF BNS, 2023 AS ILLEGAL AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ORAL ORDER The petitioner was arrested in Crime No.225/2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 178, 179, 180, 181, 182 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 is before this Court seeking relief. 2. Petitioners' primary contention is that, at the time of arrest, the petitioner was not served with the grounds of arrest which is in violation of Section 50 of BNS 2023 and Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India. 3. The learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent - State has placed on record the intimation of arrest. 4. A perusal of the same indicates that, except informing that the petitioner has been taken into custody for investigation in Crime No.225/2024 for the aforesaid offences, no grounds are disclosed for arresting the petitioner. 5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Vihaan Kumar -vs- The State of Haryana & Another, reported in (2025) 2 SCR 424 has reiterated that the requirement of informing the person arrested of the grounds of arrest is not a - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15765 CRL.P No. 4891 of 2025 mere formality, but a mandatory constitutional requirement. Article 22 is included in Part III of the Constitution under the heading of fundamental rights. Thus, it is the fundamental right of every person - who is arrested and detained in custody, to be informed of the grounds of arrest as soon as possible. If the grounds of arrest are not informed as soon as may be after the arrest, it would amount to a violation of the fundamental right of the arrestee as guaranteed under Article 22(1). It will also amount to depriving the arrestee of his liberty, to effectively challenge the arrest. Article 21 of the Constitution states that no person can be deprived of his liberty, except in accordance with the procedure established by law. 6. In the light of the decision of the Apex Court in the aforesaid case, the arrest of the petitioner stand vitiated for non-compliance of Section 50 of BNS 2023, and Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India, and in such circumstances, the petitioner is entitled to be released from judicial custody. 7. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. 8. The respondent No.1 and the Chief Superintendent of Central Prison, Parappana Agrahara, Bengaluru, is hereby directed to release the petitioner forthwith from judicial custody in C.C.No.41772/2024, on the file of the learned VI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, arising out of Crime No.225/2024 registered by the Halasuru Gate Police Station, subject to the following conditions: - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:15765 CRL.P No. 4891 of 2025 i) The petitioner-accused shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two surities for the like sum of which, one will be the Local Surety to the satisfaction of the Trial Court within a period of two weeks from the date of his release; ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses; iii) The petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court as and when summoned; iv) The Registry is directed to communicate this order to the Jail Authorities concerned forthwith without any delay through e-mail and telephonically. (v) Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file a petition afresh challenging the charge sheet. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE HR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 80