Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22441 (RAJ)

SURESH KUMAR S/O DEVINANDAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8071/2025 · 2025-06-26

Sudesh Bansal V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23618] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8071/2025 1. Suresh Kumar S/o Devinandan, Aged About 52 Years, Residence Of Village Bagawas Ahiran, Police Station Bhabaru Distt. Kothputali Behrod, At Present Head Constable 1226, Police Line Jaipur City 2. Manoj Kumar S/o Phoolsingh, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Village Post Jasai, Police Station Mundawar, Distt. Kherthal Tijara, At Present Constable 12178, Police Line Jaipur City. 3. Dinesh Kumar S/o Sundaram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Kasali, Tehasil Kothputali, P.s. Sarund, Distt. Kothputali Behrod, At Present Constable 12033, Police Line Jaipur City. 4. Amit S/o Manohar Lal, Aged About 31 Years, Residence Of Hasampur, Police Station Patan, Distt. Sikar, At Present Constable 12598, Reserve Police Line Jaipur City Jaipur 5. Vikash S/o Luxamichand, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Dayal Ki Nangal, Tehasil Neem Ka Thana, Police Station Dhabala, Distt. Sikar, At Present Constable No. 12594, Police Line Jaipur City (Petitioners are In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ali Mohd. Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL(V. J.) Order 26/06/2025 1. Instant bail application has been filed by petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.76/2025 registered [2025:RJ-JP:23618] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8071/2025] at Police Station S.M.S. Hospital District Jaipur City (east) for the offence(s) under Sections 261 and 262 of BNS and Sections 263(b), 260(b) and 61(2) of BNS (in order). 2. It has been stated that petitioners are police constables, deputed on duty in the jail and have been implicated in the present FIR on account of fleeing five accused-persons. Accused- persons were caught on the very next day. Petitioners are in custody since 26.05.2025 and conclusion of trial will take considerable time. There are no other criminal antecedents against the petitioners, therefore, bail application of the accused- persons may be allowed. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned public prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Taking into consideration the facts that petitioners are in custody since 26.05.2025; there are no criminal antecedents of petitioners; and conclusion of trial will take considerable time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioners on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners 1. Suresh Kumar S/o Devinandan, 2. Manoj Kumar S/o Phoolsingh, 3. Dinesh Kumar S/o Sundaram, 4. Amit S/o Manohar Lal and 5. Vikash S/o Luxamichand, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SUDESH BANSAL (V. J.)),J ashu /92