Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22441 (KAR)

GODWIN DEVDAS v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WPHC/32/2025 · 2025-04-22

T M Nadaf, V Kameswar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16454-DB WPHC No. 32 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF W.P.H.C. NO. 32 OF 2025 BETWEEN: GODWIN DEVDAS AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O TEJPAL MOBEN, R/A 3RD CROSS, VAISHNAVI LAYOUT, UDINHITLU, KODAVOOR VILLAGE, UDUPI DISTRICT – 576 108. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DILRAJ JUDE ROHIT SEQUEIRA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CHIEF OFFICE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE – 560 001. Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16454-DB WPHC No. 32 of 2025 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OLD DC OFFICE ROAD BANNANJE, CIRCLE BANNANJE, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT – 576 101. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER UDUPI TOWN POLICE STATION, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT – 576 101. 5. MOHAMMED AKRAM S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/A NO.8-4-2, RAMEEZ MANZIL, SANTHOSH NAGAR, KARAMBALLI, KUNJIBETTU UDUPI, KARAMBALLI, UDUPI DISTRICT – 576 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. A. BELLIAPPA, SPP ALONG WITH SRI. THEJESH P., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4; SMT. HALEEMA AMEEN, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WPHC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.4 PRODUCE THE DAUGHTER OF THE PETITIONER I.E., MISS. GINA MERIEL, D/O GODWIN DEVDAS, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, R/AT 3RD CROSS, VAISHNAVI LAYOUT, UDINHITLU KODAVOOR VILLAGE, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 108 BEFORE THIS HO'LBE COURT. THIS WPHC IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16454-DB WPHC No. 32 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Pending IAs if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (V KAMESWAR RAO) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2