Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22440 (RAJ)

SAMANDAR SINGH S/O KISHOR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8066/2025 · 2025-06-25

Sudesh Bansal V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23516] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8066/2025 Samandar Singh S/o Kishor Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Daroga Mohalla, Sethan Police Station Pisangan , Distt. Ajmer Rajasthan Presently Residing At Tulachhinagar, Bhutiya Dhani, Pisangan, Police Station Pisangan, Distt. Ajmer (Raj.) ( Presently Confined At District Jail Ajmer (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naunit Hatila, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ashvin Garg, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, Public Prosecutor. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL ( V. J.) Order 25/06/2025 1. Instant bail application has been filed by accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.90/2025 registered at Police Station Pisangan, District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner argued that as per statement of injured Jaswant Singh, allegation against the petitioner is of causing injuries to injured by pelting stones and for one injury, several persons have been implicated; there are no criminal antecedents of the accused-petitioner involving similar nature of offences; conclusion of trial is likely to take considerably long time, therefore, accused-petitioner be enlarged on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:23516] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8066/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned public prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the facts that though the injury has been opined to be grievous and dangerous to life, but for single injury, several persons have been implicated; there are no criminal antecedents of the accused-petitioner involving similar nature of offences; conclusion of trial is likely to take considerably long time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Samandar Singh S/o Kishor Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SUDESH BANSAL ( V. J.)),J Tushar/100