Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22440 (ALL)

EDICO INVENT EXPRESS THROUGH ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR VAKIL KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/5524/2025 · 2025-05-07

Anjani Kumar Mishra, Jayant Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:74611-DB Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5524 of 2025 Petitioner :- Edico Invent Express Through Its Sole Proprietor Vakil Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gulrez Khan,Javed Husain Khan Counsel for Respondent :- Ayush Mittal,C.S.C.,Vineet Sankalp Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 2-Nagar Nigam, Varanasi. By the order dated 10.02.2025 passed by the Respondent No. 3, the petitioner has been asked to remove the advertisements and structures placed by it at various places and it has also been directed that failing compliance, they would remove and demolish the same. It has further been stated in the notice that if they may have to submit any reply, they may do so. Admittedly, petitioner has not submitted any reply to the aforesaid notice dated 10.02.2025. Under such circumstances, this petition is disposed of leaving it open for the petitioner to file such objection/reply to the aforesaid notice dated 10.02.2025 within a period of ten days from today. If such an objection is filed, the competent authority will consider the same and pass appropriate order within ten days, thereafter. Order Date :- 8.5.2025 VS Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad