Shri Ram GIC vs. Sanjeev Kumar @ Manu CMP(M) No. 173 of 2025 29.05.2025 Present: Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocate, for respondent No.3. CMP No.2534 of 2025 In application filed for condonation of delay i.e. CMP(M) No. 173 of 2025, the notice has already been issued for 29th May, 2025. Therefore, this application, for reasons stated in application, is deemed to have been allowed and disposed of. CMP(M) No. 173 of 2025 Respondent No.3 stands served. Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocate, has appeared on behalf of this respondent and prays one week’s time for filing Power of Attorney. Granted. Application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. Application has been opposed by learned counsel for contesting parties that day-to-day delay, as required to be explained, has not been explained. For reasons stated in application and considering the submissions made by learned counsel for appearing parties, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered. Application is allowed and disposed of. FAO No. of 2025 (FAOST/39152/2024) Admit. Record be requisitioned. List for further orders on 19th August, 2025. CMP No. of 2025 (CMPST No.39174/2024) It has been submitted by learned counsel for appellant that amount was deposited by appellant before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur in Execution Petition preferred by claimant/respondent No.1 and same stands released in favour of claimant and therefore, this application has lost its relevancy and accordingly, the application is dismissed being not pressed. May 29, 2025 (Vivek Singh Thakur) (ms) Judge