Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22438 (GAU)

DEBASHISH KASHYAP KAKOTI v. THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/23/2025 · 2025-01-21

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010279832024 2025:GAU-AS:664 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/23/2025 DEBASHISH KASHYAP KAKOTI S/O LATE JUGAL KAKOTI, VILL- GOREHOGA DHEKIAL GAON, P.O.- AZAD LAKHIMPUR, P.S. AND DIST- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN- VERSUS THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND 3 ORS (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR GENERAL OF GAUHATI HIGH COURT, GUWAHATI-1 2:THE REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION) -CUM- IN-CHARGE CENTRALIZED RECRUITMENT GAUHATI HIGH COURT GUWAHATI-1 3:THE DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE P.O.-NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM-787001 4:THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE LAKHIMPUR TO BE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN (I.E. THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER LAKHIMPUR) P.O.-NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM-78700 Page No.# 2/3 For the Petitioner(s) : None appears For the Respondent(s) : Mr. T. J. Mahanta, Sr. Advocate Mr. K. Bhattacharjee, Govt. Advocate BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 22.01.2025 None appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called. 2. Mr. T. J. Mahanta, the learned Senior Standing Counsel of the Gauhati High Court appears on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. K. Bhattacharjee, the learned Government Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent No. 4. 3. The case of the petitioner herein is that his father expired on 11.09.2010 while serving as the Head Assistant in the Office of the District and Sessions Judge, Lakhimpur, Assam. At that relevant point of time, the petitioner was a minor. Be that as it may, the mother of the petitioner had applied for appointment under the compassionate appointment scheme. However, the petitioner could not collect any information as regards the application so filed by the mother. The petitioner on attaining majority had submitted an application in the year 2022. The said application having not been considered, the petitioner is before this Court. 4. This Court duly takes note of the relief so sought for in the instant proceedings. In addition to that, it is also seen that the Government of Assam had issued an Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024, wherein it Page No.# 3/3 has been mentioned that appointment on compassionate ground to family members of State Government employees, who die in harness prior to 31.03.2017 shall not be entertained by any Administrative Department/Authority for any reason whatsoever nor be placed before SLCs/DLCs for recommendation of candidates for appointment on compassionate ground. 5. Taking into account, the said Office Memorandum dated 18.09.2024, it is the opinion of this Court that without a challenge to the said Office Memorandum the petitioner cannot be considered for appointment on compassionate grounds. 6. Accordingly, this Court finds no merits in the instant writ petition, for which, the instant writ petition stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant