Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22434 (KAR)

SMT DEVIKA v. JAYARAM N

CCC/419/2024 · 2025-01-30

M I Arun

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4232-DB CCC No. 419 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 419 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. DEVIKA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS W/O. LATE NARAYAN RESIDING AT No.405 3RD STAGE, 2ND BLOCK BASAVESHWARANAGAR BANGALORE-560 079. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI K.S. BHEEMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. JAYARAM N. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560 001. 2. UMESH D.S. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560 001. Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4232-DB CCC No. 419 of 2024 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BENGALURU-560 001. …ACCUSED (BY SRI MURUGESH V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR ACCUSED NO.1; R.2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF CIVIL CONTEMPT AGAINST THE ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2-BDA FOR DISOBEYING, BY NOT COMPLYING WITH THE DIRECTION AS ORDERED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT, IN WRIT PETITION NO.11301/2022 (BDA), DATED 04.10.2023, WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-A AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2-BDA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH, SUITABLY IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4232-DB CCC No. 419 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Learned advocate Mr. K. S. Bheemaiah for the complainant states that the order under contempt is complied with. 2. Learned advocate for the respondent No.1 confirms the statement. 3. In that view, the contempt petition does not survive. It is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34