DR.P.RAMANAIAH v. THE J.N.T.U REP.BY ITS CORRESPONDENT & 2 OTHERS
WP/5506/2011 · 2025-03-21
K Manmadha Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22434 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22434 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010315822011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5506/2011 Between: Dr.p.ramanaiah ...PETITIONER AND The J N T U Rep By Its Correspondent 2 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M R TAGORE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
2. V R MACHAVARAM The Court made the following:
ORDER: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr V.Jagadeesh,
learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr M.R.Tagore, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.
_________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J. Date: 21.03.2025 TM