DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST v. MOHANLAL S/O LATE SHRI CHANDRA RAM
CRES/927/2024 · 2025-05-14
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22433 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22433 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:20259] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 927/2024
1. Deputy Conservator Of Forest, Sanwali Road, Near Jain Temple, Sikar.
2. Regional Forest Officer, Sanwali Road, Near Jain Temple, Sikar.
3. Aayukt, Nagar Parishad, Sikar.
4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Representative Dis.majistrate And Collector Sikar. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Mohanlal S/o Late Shri Chandra Ram, Resident Of Saalam Singh Ki Dhanni, Ward No. 25 Sikar (Raj.).
2. Pokharmal S/o Late Shri Chandra Ram, Resident Of Saalam Singh Ki Dhanni, Ward No. 25 Sikar (Raj.).
3. Moolchand S/o Late Shri Chandra Ram, Resident Of Saalam Singh Ki Dhanni, Ward No. 25 Sikar (Raj.).
4. Manoharlal S/o Late Shri Chandra Ram, Resident Of Saalam Singh Ki Dhanni, Ward No. 25 Sikar (Raj.).
5. Parmeshwar S/o Shri Nemi Chand, Resident Of Saalam Singh Ki Dhanni, Ward No. 25 Sikar (Raj.).
6. Bansidhar S/o Shri Keshar Dev, Resident Of Saalam Singh Ki Dhanni, Ward No. 25 Sikar (Raj.).
7. Rajesh Kumar S/o Shri Mahesh Kumar Saini, Resident Of Saalam Singh Ki Dhanni, Ward No. 25 Sikar (Raj.).
8. Shyam Sunder Tailor S/o Shri Radheshyam Tailor, Resident Of Saalam Singh Ki Dhanni, Ward No. 25 Sikar (Raj.).
9.
10. Smt Narbada Devi W/o Shri Keshar Dev, Resident Of Saalam Singh Ki Dhanni, Ward No. 25 Sikar (Raj.). Tarachand S/o Late Shri RamBaksram, aged about 42 year, Resident of Saalam Singh Ki Dhanni, Ward No. 25 Sikar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yashwardhan Tolani, Adv for Mr. Rahul Lodha, Adv For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
[2025:RJ-JP:20259] (2 of 2) [CRES-927/2024] Order 14/05/2025 As per office report, restoration application filed by the applicants is within time frame, therefore, no order is required to be passed on the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Hence, the application stands disposed of. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants, the restoration application is allowed, the petition is ordered to be restored at its original number, subject to deposition of cost of Rs.5000/- by the applicants with the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority and filing a receipt thereof in the Registry, within three weeks from today.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J AVINASH GULERIA /45