[2025:RJ-JP:23572] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8062/2025 Rahul Verma S/o Kailashchand, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Malutana, Police Station Thanagaji, District Alwar (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Behror) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Non-Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikash Kumar Jakhar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN (V. J.) Order 26/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.119/2025 registered at Police Station Harsora, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 111(2)(b), 310(4) & 310(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 and Sections 3/25 & 4/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that petitioner was member of gang who planned to commit dacoity. Counsel submits that no recovery has been made from the possession of petitioner. It is contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. It is further contended that petitioner is in [2025:RJ-JP:23572] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8062/2025] custody since 08.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially considering the fact that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner, absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Rahul Verma S/o Kailashchand shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. [2025:RJ-JP:23572] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8062/2025] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. ANIL KUMAR UPMAN (V. J.)),J Yogesh Kumar/88