Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22431 (CHH)

MOHD. SULTAN AHMED NIZAMI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/498/2025 · 2025-06-19

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:26006-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 498 of 2025  Mohd. Sultan Ahmed Nizami S/o Kabir Ahmed Nizami Aged About 37 Years R/o Subhash Nagar, K.K. Road, Raipur Tahsil And Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home Ministry, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Director General Of Police Police Headquarter, Sector-19, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Superintendent Of Police Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Station House Officer P.S. Khamtarai, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 5. Mohd. Parvej S/o Mohd. Hanif R/o Near Mahila Kirana Store, Laxminagar, Raipur Tahsil And Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 6. Anil Kumar Verma S/o Shri Jagmohan Prasad Verma Aged About 40 Years R/o Happy Home, Near Kukreja Farm House, Mahavir Nagar, Rajendra Nagar, Raipur Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Syed Ishhadil Ali, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Dy. G.A. For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. B.L. Dembra, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Order on Board Per Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge 20.06.2025 1. The present application has been filed by the petitioner with the Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.06.20 17:36:10 +0530 2 following prayer:- “10.1 It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and by modifying the order passed in WPCR 268/2025 dated 05.05.2025 passed by the Hon’ble DB-I and delete the portion mentioned in para 5 of the order impugned “submit a Police Report under Section 193(3) of BNSS before the competent court” in the interest of justice. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this application. 3. Learned State Counsel has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn without any further liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti