JYOTSNA MUKHERJEE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/9986/2025 · 2025-05-15
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22425 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22425 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sl.No. 220 Court No. 35 G.S.Das
15.05.2025
WPA 9986 of 2025
Jyotsna Mukherjee -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. S. S. Saha
… for the Petitioner(s) Mr. K. J. Yusuf, ld. AGP Mr. Sanjay Mukherjee
… for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Falguni Bandyopadhyay Mr. Amit Das Mr. Abhishek Banerjee
… for the private respondent(s)
The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the police authorities as no steps have been taken pursuant to the information furnished with the Officer-in- charge of Panchasayar Police Station.
State has submitted a report which reflects that pursuant to the information so furnished, a specific case has been started being Panchasayar P.S. Case No. 26 dated 17.04.2025 under the relevant provisions of law. Another case being Panchasayar P.S. Case No. 24
dated 16.04.2025 has been initiated against the petitioner on the basis of an information furnished by the respondent no.
7.
The report further reflects that there have been two extra gates installed which is the subject-matter of dispute and the same, according to the police report, is an attempt for allegedly grabbing a part of the plot belonging to the KMC.
Be that as it may, the police authorities are well aware regarding the ground reality existing. Since there is a dispute between the petitioner and the private respondents, the police authorities would keep a strict vigil as also ensure that no untoward incident results because of the strained relationship existing between the parties.
The police authorities would also ensure that none of the parties take the law in their own hand. If there are
dispute regarding demarcation of the property, in that case, appropriate authorities being the KMC would be called for to demarcate the same.
With the aforesaid observations, WPA 9986 of 2025 is disposed of.
Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of.
Report so submitted be kept with the record.
Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)