Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22425 (AP)

V RUPESH v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/15911/2025 · 2025-07-03

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010316662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15911/2025 Between: 1. V RUPESH, S/O. V LOKANATH ACHARI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. 20-36/1, THUMMALAGUNTA ROAD, GANDHIPURAM, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATHI. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER/ CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALLIPIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALLIPIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 5. K SASIKALA, W/O K MANIKANTACHARY, R/O. 18-6-252, SUDARAIAH NAGAR, TIRUPATHI, 517501. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th Respondents at the instance of Respondent, in insisting the petitioner to settle the amount of Rs 15 lakhs to the 5th Respondent, as illegal, HN, J W.P.No.15911_2025 2 irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere in any manner with the petitioner personal life, liberty and landed properties and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Respondents 3 and not to call to the Petitioner to the 3rd and 4th Respondents Police Station, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAIDU SIVA RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME HN, J W.P.No.15911_2025 3 The Court made the following Order: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the behest of respondent No.5 respondent Nos.3 and 4 are pressurizing the petitioner to settle the amount with the 5th respondent. 2. Heard. 3. The Writ Petition is disposed off by directing respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to disturb the peace of the petitioner without following the due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 04.07.2025 NKA HN, J W.P.No.15911_2025 4 322 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Writ Petition No.15911 of 2025 Date: 04.07.2025 NKA