APHC010317162020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20974/2020 Between: 1. ALLU ADI VENKATA NARAYANA, S/O.SATYANARAYANA AGE 39 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF RAYALAM VILLAGE, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DIST, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DGP, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P 3. THE DIRECTOR INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ELURU RANGA, ELURU WEST GODAVARI DIST, A.P. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DIST, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST, A.P. 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARSAPURAM SUB-DIVISION, NARSAPURAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM II TOWN PS BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. 7. RAYUDU VIJAY KUMAR, S/O.NOT KNOWN AGE 53 YEARS, OCC GOVT. SERVICE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, BHIMAVARAM II TOWN PS BHIMAVARA-534201, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N N SOMENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court Made the Following Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ of mandamus declaring the in action of the respondent nos 3 to 6 to forbid the 7th respondent from involvement of civil matter forcing the petitioner to settle the civil matter pending in court even in 2 subsistence of interim order and keeping shop keys of Hailand Shoes bearing D.No.3-13-31, Bonda Enclave Bhimavaram for settlement with the 7th respondent as illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and voilative of fundamental rights of the petitioner and contrary to Articles 14 19 and 21 of the constitution of India consequently direct the respondent no 2 to 4 to take necessary action under criminal and disciplinary proceedings against the 7th respondent besides providing compensation to the petitioner against the loss sustained due to illegal activities of the 7th respondent in the official duty” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter was compromised before the Lok Adalat and requests this Court to close the present petition. 3. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stands closed. __________________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 02.09.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20974 of 2020 Dt.02.09.2025 Asr