M/S J K GROUP OF CONSTRUCTION TH TOHEED ALAM v. U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY JAL SHAKTI DEPTT AND OTHERS
WP(C)/444/2023 · 2025-03-07
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2242 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2242 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- WP (C) No. 444/2023
M/S JK Group of Consruction …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
UT of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Sagira Jaffer, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (07.03.2025)
The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 27.09.2024 and same is the position even today, which clearly shows that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant matter any further. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non- prosecution along with all connected applications. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
07.03.2025
Rahul
S. No. 49 Ram Krishan 2025.03.10 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document