Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23515] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8041/2025 Kailashi S/o Rambharosi, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Sanora Police Station Angai District Dholpur. (Accused Petitioner In Judicial Custody In District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, Public Prosecutor.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL ( V. J.)
Order 25/06/2025
1. Instant bail application has been filed by accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.85/2024 registered at Police Station Angai, District Dholpur for the offences punishable under Sections 3/7 of The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (Amended 2020).
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner argued that allegation against the accused-petitioner in the FIR is that during the course of inspection, he was found distributing less quantity of the essential commodities at his fair price shop; there are no criminal antecedents of the accused-petitioner involving similar nature of offences; the offences alleged against the accused- petitioner are triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial is likely to take considerably long time, therefore, accused-petitioner be enlarged on bail.
[2025:RJ-JP:23515] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8041/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
4. Heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned public prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
5. Taking into consideration the nature of allegation made against the accused-petitioner in the FIR; there are no criminal antecedents of the accused-petitioner involving similar nature of offences; the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are triable by Magistrate; conclusion of trial is likely to take considerably long time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Kailashi S/o Rambharosi shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SUDESH BANSAL ( V. J.)),J Tushar/94