Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010279232024 2025:GAU-AS:7279 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/7/2025 ON THE DEATH OF SRI NANDESWAR PAGAG HIS LEGAL HEIR- R/O VILL- BORGURI, P.O.-RANGACHAHI (MISING GAON), P.S.- JENGRAIMUKH, DIST-MAJULI, ASSAM, PIN-785104 1.1: SMTI. SUMTHIRA PAGAG W/O LATE NANDESWAR PAGAG R/O VILL-BORGURI PO-RANGACHAHI (MISSING GAON) PS-JENGRAIMUKH PIN-785104 DISTRICT-MAJULI ASSAM VERSUS CHANDAN SHARMA AND 6 ORS. COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, PWD (ROADS) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06, DIST-KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2:SANTANU P GOTMARE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS TRAINING PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES (ARTP AND PG) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 DIST-KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3:SANJIV SHYAM CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (ROADS) ASSAM CHANDMARI Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI-03 DIST-KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 4:JYOTI KAMAL DOLEY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD TEOK AND MARIANI TERRITORIAL ROAD DIVISION JORHAT-07 DIST-JORHAT ASSAM 5:BIREN HANDIQUE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWRD MAJULI DISTRICT TERRITORIAL ROAD DIVISION GARAMUR PIN-785104 DIST-MAJULI ASSAM 6:K S GOPINATH NARAYAN PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA P.O.-BELTOLA GUWAHATI-29 DIST-KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 7:JAYANT NARLIKAR COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D BORAH, MR. R DOWARAH Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B GOGOI (R7), MS. N DEY(R-1),MS TOSHISENLA(R-1),MR. R DHAR (R-1),R M BAROOAH (R7),MR A CHALIHA (R7),MR P NAYAK (R7) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE Page No.# 3/3 ORDER Date : 04.06.2025 Heard Mr. D. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. R. K. Talukdar, Mr. R. Dhar and Mr. A. Chaliha, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor by placing the order dated 07.03.2025 submits that the order of this Court dated 18.01.2024 passed in WP(C) 4220/2019, has duly been complied with. Although Mr. D. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the order has not been complied with, on perusal of the communication placed by the learned counsel for the alleged contemnor dated 07.03.2025, reflects that the order of the Court has duly been complied with. Since the petitioner has expired during the pendency of this proceeding, the legal heirs may approach the concerned authority. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant