Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22412 (RAJ)

SURYA S/O RAJPAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8035/2025 · 2025-06-25

Sudesh Bansal V J

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23511] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8035/2025 Surya S/o Rajpal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 263/154, Gali No. 2, Village Ghodli, Krishna Nagar, Police Station Krishna Nagar, District Shadara, Delhi (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Kotputali, District Kotputali-Behror). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anish Bhadala, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shri Ram Dhakar, Public Prosecutor. Ms. Manju Dave Public Prosecutor. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL ( V. J.) Order 25/06/2025 1. Instant bail application has been filed by accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.0248/2023 registered at Police Station Bhabru, District Kotputli-Behror for the offences punishable under Section 420 of IPC, 1860 and 66D of IT Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner argued that there are no criminal antecedents of the accused-petitioner involving similar nature of offences; the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are triable by Magistrate; accused-petitioner is in custody since 20.05.2025; conclusion of trial is likely to take considerably long time, therefore, accused-petitioner be enlarged on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:23511] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8035/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutors have opposed the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned public prosecutors and perused the material available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the facts that there are no criminal antecedents of the accused-petitioner involving similar nature of offences; the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are triable by Magistrate; accused-petitioner is in custody since 20.05.2025; conclusion of trial is likely to take considerably long time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Surya S/o Rajpal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SUDESH BANSAL ( V. J.)),J Tushar/89